5,6,7,8-Tetrahydroquinoxaline (CAS 34413-35-9) — Green Heart Note Fragrance Ingredient

Green · Woody

5,6,7,8-Tetrahydroquinoxaline

CAS 34413-35-9

Origin
synthetic
Note
Heart
IFRA
Use with awareness
Data as of: Apr 2026

What Is 5,6,7,8-Tetrahydroquinoxaline?

5,6,7,8-Tetrahydroquinoxaline is a synthetic aroma chemical used in niche perfumery. It’s found in some modern fragrances seeking unusual earthy-green effects. This ingredient matters because it offers perfumers a unique tool for creating complex, intellectual scents that challenge traditional fragrance structures.

Safety Profile

USE WITH AWARENESS
Generally safeUse with awarenessProfessional use
Stable in formulations
Limited safety data available
CAS
34413-35-9
Formula
Mixture
MW
Variable
Odor Family
Green · Woody
Layer 1 · Enthusiast

What Does 5,6,7,8-Tetrahydroquinoxaline Smell Like?

5,6,7,8-Tetrahydroquinoxaline presents an intriguing olfactory paradox – simultaneously earthy like damp forest soil yet with a sharp, almost metallic greenness reminiscent of crushed stems. The initial impression is intensely vegetal, evolving into a dry, papery character with hints of tobacco leaf. In drydown, it leaves a subtle mineralic trace, like wet stones warmed by sunlight. Its persistence is moderate, working best when paired with materials that can soften its angular edges.

Scent Profile
Layer 2

2D Molecular Structure

5,6,7,8-Tetrahydroquinoxaline

SMILES: C1CCC2=NC=CN=C2C1

Chemistry, Properties & Perfumer Guide

The Chemistry

5,6,7,8-Tetrahydroquinoxaline belongs to the quinoxaline class of heterocyclic compounds, characterized by a benzene ring fused to a pyrazine ring. As a synthetic material, it’s produced through catalytic hydrogenation of quinoxaline derivatives. The partially saturated structure contributes to its distinctive odor profile, with the nitrogen atoms playing a key role in its binding to olfactory receptors. Its molecular rigidity gives it excellent stability in fragrance formulations.

Physical & Chemical Properties

AppearanceColorless to pale yellow liquid
SolubilitySoluble in alcohol, insoluble in water

Perfumer Guide

Note Position
Heart
Volatility
Moderate (2-4 hours)
Blending
Challenging
ApplicationTypical %RangeNotes
Fine Fragrance0.1-0.5%Up to 1%Used as an accent material
Functional FragranceTraceUp to 0.1%Rarely used

Classic Accords

Tip: Use sparingly in chypre or fougère bases to add intellectual depth.

Alternatives & Comparisons

1
Trimethylpyrazine CAS 14667-55-1

Offers similar earthy notes but with more nutty character and better blending properties.

2
Isobutyl quinoline CAS 93-19-6

Provides comparable green-leather effects but with greater diffusion and tenacity.

Layer 3

Safety, Regulatory & Sustainability

⚠ Regulatory Disclaimer

General reference only. Consult current IFRA Standards Library before formulating.

IFRA Status

Not currently restricted by IFRA standards.

RIFM Assessment

No formal RIFM evaluation available. Use recommended at low levels pending further studies.

Sustainability

As a synthetic material, 5,6,7,8-Tetrahydroquinoxaline has minimal environmental impact in production. Its high potency means small quantities suffice, reducing overall material usage. The synthesis route typically employs green chemistry principles with good atom economy.

Explore 5,6,7,8-Tetrahydroquinoxaline

Browse essential oils and aroma compounds.

Browse on iHerb →

Affiliate disclosure: we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.

References

  1. Burdock, G.A. (2010). Fenaroli’s Handbook of Flavor Ingredients. CRC Press.
  2. Arctander, S. (1969). Perfume and Flavor Chemicals. Allured Publishing.

Data: PubChem (NIH), PubMed, RIFM, IFRA. Last reviewed: Apr 2026.

Report a data error

Ingredient Data Sheet

CAS 34413-35-9

Physical Properties

Molecular Weight134.18 g/mol🔬 PubChem
LogP (Octanol-Water)0.9🔬 PubChem
Boiling Point108 °C🔬 EPA CompTox
log Kp (skin permeability)-2.879💻 Calculated
SMILESC1CCC2=NC=CN=C2C1🔬 PubChem

Volatility & Performance

Fragrance NoteTop💻 Calculated

Odor & Flavor

Primary Descriptorsnuttyroasted• leffingwell
Functional Groupsaromatic💻 RDKit
“/cTcH The material resembles para-Methylquino- z Iine with respect to odor, but it has not o become nearly as well known or popular in \~,&H, perfumery. o This quinoline is rarely offered commercial- COHIIN = 133.20 ly, and it could be because of the mentioned lack of “softness” in its initial odor. Rather rough or harsh-caramellic-Honey- like, sweet odor with discrete animal character.”📖 Arctander

Regulatory Status

IOFI ClassificationNature Identical📖 Fenaroli
Data Sources & Attribution
Physical data: PubChem (NIH/NLM), U.S. EPA CompTox Dashboard, EPA OPERA models, RDKit. Odor & flavor: Arctander (Perfume & Flavor Chemicals), Fenaroli's Handbook of Flavor Ingredients, Leffingwell. Thresholds: van Gemert (Compilations of Odour Threshold Values). Regulatory: IFRA Standards 51st, FEMA GRAS. Trade names: Surburg (Common Fragrance & Flavor Materials). All data compiled and cross-referenced for perfumertools.com.

Physicochemical Properties

DTXSID: DTXSID4047678

Physical Properties

Molecular Weight 134.182 g/mol🔬 EPA CompTox
Density 1.077 g/cm^3🔬 EPA CTX
Boiling Point 109.5 °C🔬 EPA CTX
Melting Point 29.5 °C🔬 EPA CTX
Flash Point 94.088 °C📊 OPERA
Refractive Index 1.552 Dimensionless📊 OPERA
Molar Volume 122.71 cm^3/mol📊 OPERA

Partition & Solubility

LogP (Octanol-Water) 1.46 Log10 unitless📊 OPERA
LogD (pH 5.5) 1.46 Log10 unitless📊 OPERA
LogD (pH 7.4) 1.46 Log10 unitless📊 OPERA
LogKoa (Octanol-Air) 5.06 Log10 unitless📊 OPERA
Water Solubility 0.297 mol/L📊 OPERA
Henry's Law Constant 0 atm-m3/mole📊 OPERA

Transport Properties

Vapor Pressure 0.038 mmHg📊 OPERA
Viscosity 6.69 cP📊 OPERA
Surface Tension 41.472 dyn/cm📊 OPERA
Thermal Conductivity 134.856 mW/(m*K)📊 OPERA

Molecular Descriptors

Topological Polar Surface Area 25.78 Ų💻 Computed
H-Bond Donors 0 count💻 Computed
H-Bond Acceptors 2 count💻 Computed
Rotatable Bonds 0 count💻 Computed
Aromatic Rings 1 count💻 Computed
Molar Refractivity 39.221 cm^3/mol📊 OPERA
Polarizability 15.549 Å^3📊 OPERA

Data Sources:

🔬 EPA Experimental data from U.S. EPA CompTox Chemicals Dashboard & CTX APIs. 📊 OPERA Predicted using EPA's OPERA QSAR models. 💻 Computed Calculated from SMILES using RDKit.

Similar Posts